Jill Stien

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 29

The statement and accompanying images constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant political issue, namely the actions and policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and their impact on Palestinians. The statement calls for a public demonstration and makes serious allegations against Netanyahu, framing him as a war criminal and accusing him of genocide. The tone is highly charged and confrontational, aiming to mobilize people for a protest.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language and serious accusations, which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Netanyahu, labeling him a war criminal and genocidal without a legal basis. This could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and inflammatory language. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Netanyahu. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to mobilize people for a cause, which can be seen as using influence for societal change. However, the approach is aggressive and confrontational. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that could be considered irresponsible and lacking in integrity due to its inflammatory nature. [-1]