Reposted by Speaker Mike Johnson
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a significant public issue: the requirement of proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections. The tone is assertive and accusatory, suggesting that Democrats oppose the bill because they want non-citizens to vote. The intent appears to be to rally support for the bill and criticize the opposing party.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a divisive tone that could contribute to polarization. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation against Democrats that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on rallying support and criticizing the opposition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping accusation against Democrats without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly by making broad accusations without evidence.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.