Jill Stien

The statement '@PaulSorrentino3 They really do...' is a brief reply in a conversation chain that involves a political opinion. The original statement by @DrJillStein addresses a public issue regarding ballot access and voter choice, which constitutes public discourse. However, the reply itself lacks substantive engagement with the issue and does not contribute meaningfully to the civic dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but it does not contribute positively either.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does echo a potentially inflammatory statement without evidence.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it merely agrees with a negative assertion. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it simply agrees with a broad, negative generalization. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society; it perpetuates a divisive narrative. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it echoes a potentially harmful generalization without contributing to a meaningful discussion. [-1]