Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the White House Press Secretary's response to questions about a neurologist's visit in relation to the president. The tone is critical and suggests a lack of transparency from the Press Secretary.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is critical but not harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the Press Secretary's response rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on pointing out a perceived lack of transparency. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the response rather than the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a public concern without resorting to harmful language. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.