Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a political endorsement for Jill Stein, highlighting her policy positions and contrasting them with those of other candidates. The tone is supportive of Stein and critical of other political figures, particularly in terms of their foreign policy and communication skills.
- The statement aims to promote a candidate who advocates for healthcare and housing, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, it includes a negative comparison to other candidates, which could be seen as harmful. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does include a critical remark about other candidates' communication skills, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for healthcare and housing, but the negative comparison detracts from this. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it makes a disparaging remark about other candidates. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote a candidate who advocates for societal betterment, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to advocate for a political candidate, but the negative comparison could be seen as lacking integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.