Matt Taibbi

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -49

The statement by @ItsDanNotDon is a hyperbolic and provocative response to a discussion about governmental requests for content moderation on social media platforms. The statement uses an extreme and inflammatory hypothetical scenario to criticize the potential overreach of governmental power in regulating speech and content. The tone is sarcastic and alarmist, aiming to draw attention to perceived dangers of unchecked governmental authority.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does harm by using an extreme and sensitive example (child rape) in a hyperbolic manner, which can be distressing and offensive to many people. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it trivializes a serious crime for the sake of making a point. (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses shock value to make a point, which can alienate and upset people. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses an extreme hypothetical scenario to criticize a policy, which is not conducive to a productive discussion. (-2 points) [-2]