The statement reports on a discussion among US Senators regarding the electability of Joe Biden, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue, specifically the political landscape and potential outcomes of an election. The tone is neutral and factual, simply relaying information about what was said during a Senate lunch.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a factual report of what was said, without inflammatory language or personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It simply reports on a political discussion. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it also does not detract from these values. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, nor does it engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward report of a discussion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing factual information about a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.