Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement involves a public figure, George Stephanopoulos, and his comments about President Biden's ability to serve another term. This touches on public issues and contributes to civic dialogue, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to public doubt about a sitting president's capabilities. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- Stephanopoulos acknowledges his mistake in responding to a passerby, which aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing the issue through a spokesperson and acknowledging the mistake. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.