Bret Baier

The statement and the linked conversation involve a public figure, George Stephanopoulos, making a comment about President Joe Biden's ability to serve another term. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the fitness of a sitting president for re-election.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it could contribute to public debate about a sensitive issue.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to public dialogue.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it is a critique of a public figure's capability. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   Stephanopoulos acknowledges and corrects his mistake by saying he shouldn't have responded to the question. [+2]
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to contribute to public discourse, though the impact on society's betterment is neutral.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly, though the integrity of the comment is debatable given the retraction. [+1]