The statement by Rep. Mike Quigley (D-IL) involves a comparison between two political figures, which is a substantive engagement with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue. The tone is critical and evaluative, aiming to provide an honest opinion about the performance of a current president compared to a former president.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm, but the comparative nature could be seen as indirectly disparaging. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a negative comparison.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does aim to provide an honest opinion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express an opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.