Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Rank 15 of 47
Score 181

The statement by AOC (Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) addresses a public issue, specifically the economic rights of companies and their impact on public health. The tone is accusatory and critical, suggesting that some committee members are defending harmful corporate practices. The intent appears to be to raise awareness and possibly incite action against these practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a harmful practice, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could be seen as potentially harmful to the individuals being criticized. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a strong accusation against unnamed committee members, which could be seen as a violation of their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad accusation without engaging in a detailed discussion or offering solutions. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses AOC's influence to bring attention to a significant public issue, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, but the integrity of the statement could be questioned due to its accusatory nature. [+1]