Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 32

The statement expresses concern about the suppression of discussions related to Israel and Zionism, framing it as a threat to civil liberties and freedom of speech. The tone is critical and suggests a perceived infringement on fundamental rights.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critical tone could potentially provoke strong reactions. It neither significantly upholds nor violates this principle.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness about the perceived suppression of speech, which aligns with promoting empathy and compassion for those who feel silenced. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the issue of civil liberties and freedom of speech, which is constructive criticism. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for open discussions on controversial topics. It uses the platform responsibly to highlight a perceived issue with civil liberties. [+2]