Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant policy decision by the Biden administration regarding tariffs on Chinese metals routed through Mexico. This is a substantive engagement with public issues, specifically trade policy and international relations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a factual report on a policy decision.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement is neutral and factual, and does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. However, it does provide information that could lead to a better understanding of trade policies.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward report on a policy decision.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By informing the public about a significant policy decision, the statement uses its influence for the betterment of society by contributing to an informed citizenry. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity by providing factual information about a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.