Jill Stien

The statement by @DrJillStein constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about political affiliations, accusations, and public figures' integrity. The tone is confrontational and defensive, aiming to counter accusations made by @harrisonjaime.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not strive to do no harm; it is accusatory and confrontational, potentially causing harm to the reputation of @harrisonjaime. (-2 points) [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of @harrisonjaime and engages in a form of public shaming. (-2 points) [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on defending oneself and attacking the other. (-2 points) [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes; it is purely defensive. (0 points)
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society; it contributes to a hostile and divisive discourse. (-2 points) [-2]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity. (-1 point) [-1]