Jill Stien

Rank 29 of 47
|
Score 32

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political issues, specifically the dynamics of electoral politics and the influence of third-party candidates. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, with the intent to criticize and challenge the actions and motivations of political opponents.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses derogatory language ('Genocide Joe') and implies malicious intent ('pay your lawyers to kick me off the ballot'). This violates the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it engages in name-calling and personal attacks, which can be considered a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the substantive issues at hand. [-2]