Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and image constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about political figures, their affiliations, and the influence of lobbying on politics. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to discredit Jaime Harrison by highlighting his financial ties to a specific lobby group. The content suggests a critique of political influence and transparency.
- The statement and image could be seen as harmful as they aim to discredit Jaime Harrison by focusing on his financial ties, potentially leading to public backlash or harassment. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image do not respect the privacy and dignity of Jaime Harrison, as they highlight his financial ties in a negative light and label him as a 'failed candidate.'Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they contribute to a divisive and accusatory discourse. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and image do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, they focus on personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and image use the platform to influence public opinion against Jaime Harrison, but not necessarily for the betterment of society as it promotes a negative and divisive narrative. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.