Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97
7/10/2024, 11:24:59 PM
X
In reply to:
Jason
@Greenfoxrugby
·
361d
@DrJillStein Jill, I just put your bumper sticker on my car today.
I’m fed up with the corruption and arrogance of the @TheDemocrats
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
361d
I’m not the one chipping away at Genocide Joe’s support, he does that every time he opens his mouth.

I'm getting votes from the majority of Americans who are already done with the 2-party trap. But you know that, that's why you pay your lawyers to kick me off the ballot, right?…
Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
·
361d
Actually you just aren’t worth any more of my time.

But it seems you need something to do… just call Donald… he’s a big fan. You can get a group chat going with your other besties Vladimir and Kim.

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about political campaigns, election strategies, and the integrity of political parties. The tone of the conversation is confrontational and critical, with participants expressing strong opinions about each other's political actions and motivations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The conversation includes personal attacks and derogatory language, which can be harmful and divisive. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it includes personal attacks and accusations. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is confrontational and accusatory. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it includes personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]