The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by addressing the ethical standards and practices in journalism, specifically concerning allegations of plagiarism and professional integrity. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to hold journalists accountable for their actions.
- The statement aims to hold journalists accountable for ethical behavior, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone and public shaming could be seen as harmful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the individuals involved by not disclosing personal information, but it does call out specific journalists by name, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does so in a manner that could be perceived as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.