In reply to:
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public health issue, specifically the safety of vaccines and the integrity of vaccine research. The tone is accusatory and celebratory, suggesting a victory over perceived misinformation. The content includes a personal attack on Dr. Stanley Plotkin, labeling him as the 'Dark Deity of vaccinology,' and claims that 'everything was a lie,' which implies a broad and sweeping condemnation of vaccine safety research.
- The statement violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using inflammatory language and making broad accusations without nuanced discussion. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Dr. Stanley Plotkin, engaging in cyberbullying by calling him the 'Dark Deity of vaccinology.' (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, instead fostering division and mistrust. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, opting for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to potentially mislead and incite fear rather than for the betterment of society. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.