Matt Taibbi

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -49

The statement criticizes NYT writers for not crediting a breaking news story, suggesting that failing to do so is a significant ethical lapse. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, using strong language to express disapproval.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses harsh language ('officially suck') which can be harmful and inflammatory. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it publicly shames specific individuals without constructive dialogue. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issue in a respectful manner. [-2]