The statement criticizes NYT writers for not crediting a breaking news story, suggesting that failing to do so is a significant ethical lapse. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, using strong language to express disapproval.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses harsh language ('officially suck') which can be harmful and inflammatory.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others; it publicly shames specific individuals without constructive dialogue.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory and dismissive.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism; it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issue in a respectful manner.
[-2]