The statement and the referenced conversations involve a discussion on the use of derogatory language and its context, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to language, respect, and societal norms. The tone is confrontational and defensive, and the intent appears to be to justify the use of certain derogatory terms in specific contexts while responding to criticism.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. Using derogatory terms, even in a discussion about their context, can perpetuate harm and normalize their use. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others and engages in language that can be considered cyberbullying or hate speech. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it defends the use of harmful language. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does engage in dialogue with those in disagreement but does so in a confrontational manner and includes personal attacks. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it defends the use of harmful language. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.