Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Jason Call 🇵🇸 Green Party WA02 JillStein2024 CM
@CallForCongress
·
364d
The statement criticizes the denial of federal matching funds to Dr. Jill Stein's campaign, suggesting it is unjust and unprecedented. The tone is critical and the intent is to highlight perceived unfair treatment of a third-party candidate, which contributes to public discourse on electoral fairness and political equity.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a critique of a policy decision rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on a public issue rather than engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting an issue of fairness in the electoral process, though it could be more constructive in its language. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of a policy decision without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to bring attention to an issue that could impact the fairness of the electoral process, aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public concern. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.