The statement and the accompanying image engage in public discourse by discussing political preferences and referencing public figures and their statements. The tone is decisive and supportive of a particular candidate, Jill Stein, while the image shows a contentious exchange between public figures on social media.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the image includes a contentious exchange that could be seen as harmful or divisive. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of others, but the image includes potentially defamatory remarks, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the author's political stance, but the image does not foster empathy or compassion due to its contentious nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but the image includes ad hominem arguments, which violate this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the author's influence to express a political preference, which can be seen as an attempt to contribute to societal betterment, but the image's contentious nature may undermine this effort. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.