Reposted by Ayanna Pressley
The statement addresses public issues related to the influence of dark money on the Supreme Court, judicial appointments, and a specific project, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived threats to democratic institutions.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but uses strong language ('destroy our institutions') which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does target specific individuals and organizations, which could be seen as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes strong accusations without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about a public issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles but could be more responsible and balanced in its critique.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.