Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement and accompanying image are highly charged and express strong opposition to the actions of Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly regarding the displacement of Palestinians in Gaza. The tone is urgent and accusatory, aiming to mobilize people to protest against what the author perceives as war crimes and genocide. The content is focused on a specific political issue and calls for public action, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by opposing actions it views as war crimes and genocide, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory language could potentially incite hostility. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Benjamin Netanyahu, labeling him a 'war criminal' without a legal basis, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy and compassion for Palestinians by highlighting their plight, but it does so in a manner that could incite anger rather than understanding. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses strong, accusatory language and does not offer a platform for discussion or alternative viewpoints. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to mobilize people for a cause, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the approach is confrontational and could polarize opinions. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, given its potential to incite hostility and its lack of constructive dialogue. [-1]