The Vigilant Fox 🦊
@VigilantFox
·
104d
The statement engages with a public issue, specifically the media's handling of vaccine side effects and the influence of pundits on public opinion, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical but not overtly hostile, and the intent appears to be to provide a counterpoint to the original post by @VigilantFox.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does criticize the media's handling of information, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by providing an alternative perspective on why people might be resistant to vaccines, though it could be more empathetic in its delivery. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out perceived flaws in the media's reporting and the influence of pundits, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to contribute to a public debate responsibly. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.