Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
·
372d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically addressing allegations of political associations and the credibility of congressional investigations. The tone is defensive and accusatory, aiming to refute a claim made by another public figure.
- The statement aims to refute a potentially harmful accusation, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the accusatory tone could escalate conflict, which might indirectly cause harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by defending Jill Stein against an accusation. However, it indirectly accuses Jaime of undermining Congress, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on refuting an accusation rather than fostering a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by addressing the validity of Jaime's claim. However, it also includes a personal attack by suggesting Jaime believes Congress can't do its job, which is an ad hominem argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to defend a public figure, but the accusatory tone could be seen as lacking in responsibility and integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.