Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes AIPAC and suggests leaving the organization in favor of the Green Party. It engages in public discourse by addressing political affiliations and endorsements, which are public issues. The tone is critical and suggests a call to action.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but criticizes an organization, which is a common aspect of political discourse. However, the term 'anti-Democratic' could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of 'anti-Democratic' could be seen as disrespectful to those who support AIPAC. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticizing and suggesting an alternative. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong negative assertion without providing a detailed argument or engaging with opposing views. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.