Jill Stien

Rank 42 of 47

Score -86

-6

AIPAC should have to register as a foreign agent and should be banned from spending money to influence US elections. AIPAC spending has drowned out debate and bought a US government that is aiding and abetting genocide. #Debate2024

7/13/2024, 1:23:44 AM

The statement addresses a public issue related to the influence of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) on US elections and its implications on US foreign policy. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that AIPAC's actions are harmful and unethical. The intent appears to be to provoke debate and call for regulatory changes regarding AIPAC's activities.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, particularly the accusation of aiding and abetting genocide, which is a serious charge. This could incite strong reactions and potentially harm individuals associated with AIPAC. (-2 points) [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the strong language could be seen as disrespectful to those associated with AIPAC. (-1 point) [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational stance. (-1 point) [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a strong accusation without inviting discussion or providing evidence. (-2 points) [-2]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The statement uses the platform to call for changes that the speaker believes would benefit society by reducing undue influence on elections. (+1 point) [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to the strong accusations made without evidence. (-1 point) [-1]