The statement expresses a political stance on pardoning Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and Leonard Peltier, and suggests their inclusion in an administration. It is a substantive engagement with public issues, particularly related to justice, whistleblowing, and government transparency.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It advocates for pardoning individuals who have been controversial but does not incite violence or harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards individuals who have been involved in significant public controversies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on a policy stance rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to advocate for a policy change that they believe would benefit society, particularly in terms of justice and transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.