In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
560d
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
560d
The statement and the associated content constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues, specifically the withholding of public matching funds and the promotion of a political rally. The tone is confrontational and critical of the current administration, using strong language and imagery to convey a sense of urgency and opposition.
- The statement uses strong language and imagery that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially causing harm by fostering divisiveness. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of Janet Yellen, depicting her in a negative and exaggerated manner. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy among supporters of Jill Stein's campaign, but it does so by creating an 'us vs. them' narrative. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against Janet Yellen. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to mobilize supporters and raise awareness about perceived injustices, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment from the perspective of the campaign. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the use of inflammatory language and imagery. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.