Jill Stien

The statement 'I am voting #JillStein2024' in response to a conversation about voting preferences and political stances on Gaza constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue and contributes to the civic dialogue about political choices and their implications.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does not actively strive to do no harm either. Neutral impact.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Positive impact. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Neutral impact.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It simply states a voting preference. Positive impact. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By expressing a voting preference, the statement uses influence in a way that could be seen as contributing to the political discourse, though it does not explicitly aim for societal betterment. Neutral impact.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly without any evident misuse. Positive impact. [+1]