In reply to:
Munawwar
@GunnerArchitect
·
531d
The statement and the image involve a discussion about political figures and their social media presence, which can be considered part of public discourse. The image includes tweets from public figures discussing various political topics, which adds context to the conversation.
- The statement itself does not cause harm, but the image includes tweets that could be seen as inflammatory or accusatory, which might cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, but the image includes tweets that could be seen as disrespectful or accusatory. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, and the image includes tweets that are more confrontational than constructive. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but the image includes tweets that could be seen as personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and the image involve public figures and political discourse, which can be seen as using influence for societal engagement, but the tone of the tweets in the image could be more constructive.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.