Reposted by Bret Baier
ian bremmer
@ianbremmer
·
360d
The statement and the accompanying image appear to be a commentary on a significant and dramatic event involving a public figure. The tone is one of admiration and praise for the individual's reaction to a crisis. The statement touches on themes of leadership, resilience, and the impact on political history. It is important to evaluate how well this statement upholds the principles of public discourse, particularly in terms of doing no harm, respecting privacy and dignity, promoting understanding, and using influence responsibly.
- The statement does not appear to do harm directly, but it could be seen as sensationalizing a violent event, which might contribute to a harmful narrative. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individual involved, but it does not address the potential impact on others who may be affected by the event or its portrayal.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on glorifying a reaction to violence, which may not foster constructive dialogue or empathy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement uses the platform to highlight a dramatic moment, but it does not necessarily use influence for the betterment of society. It could be seen as contributing to a culture of sensationalism rather than thoughtful discourse. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.