Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues, specifically the rhetoric surrounding political figures and the potential consequences of such rhetoric. The tone is critical and highlights the dangers of inflammatory language used by political leaders.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it highlights and potentially amplifies harmful rhetoric by repeating inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in language that could be seen as cyberbullying or hate speech, particularly with the phrase 'put Trump in a bullseye.' [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it escalates the rhetoric. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it includes a personal attack and inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use the platform responsibly and with integrity, as it repeats and potentially legitimizes harmful rhetoric. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.