Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses political violence and references historical and contemporary political figures, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived hypocrisy and systemic issues within the government.
- The statement condemns political violence, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, it also uses strong accusatory language that could be seen as inflammatory.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make broad accusations against political figures, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses more on criticism than on fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions. It also makes broad accusations, which could be seen as personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight issues of political violence, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by raising awareness. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and addresses significant public issues, but the accusatory tone may not fully align with using the platform responsibly and with integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.