In reply to:
synth magick
@MagickSynt25505
·
531d
The statement by @MagickSynt25505 and the subsequent reply by the campaign representative constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues, specifically Indigenous and disability issues, and the political campaign of Jill Stein. The tone is respectful and informative, aiming to direct the audience to more detailed information on the campaign's platform.
- The statement does no harm and is respectful in tone, adhering to the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by directing the audience to more information about the campaign's stance on important issues. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the concerns raised by @MagickSynt25505 without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to inform and potentially better society by addressing public concerns and promoting a political campaign that aims to address these issues. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.