Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement addresses a serious public issue, specifically the attempted assassination of a presidential candidate, and responds to public reactions and comparisons to a film. The tone is serious and aims to clarify the reality of the situation while criticizing those who deny the event.
- The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying the seriousness of the assassination attempt, which is a responsible action. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language ('truly in a deranged') which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by clarifying the reality of the situation, but the use of the term 'deranged' may undermine empathy and compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement, instead it uses a personal attack ('truly in a deranged'). [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a significant public issue responsibly, though the language could be more measured. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.