Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement appears to be a sensational headline and description related to a significant public event involving an assassination attempt on a former president. It is intended to inform the public about a media decision in response to a serious incident, which constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the sensational nature of the headline could contribute to public anxiety or fear. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does touch on a sensitive topic that could affect the dignity of those involved. This is neutral.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on sensationalism. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a straightforward report without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. This is neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech but could be seen as using the platform irresponsibly due to its sensational nature. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.