The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing the decision of a major news network to pull a prominent program off the air during a significant political event. The tone is critical and uses strong language to express disapproval of MSNBC's decision.
- The statement uses strong language ('clusterfuck') which can be seen as harmful and inflammatory, reducing the quality of discourse. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals involved, as it uses derogatory language. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical and does not offer constructive feedback. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to name-calling rather than reasoned argument. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.