Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by addressing U.S. foreign policy and inviting viewers to compare the approaches of different administrations. The tone is critical and seeks to provoke discussion on the continuity of foreign policy across different presidencies.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply criticism of current and past administrations, which is a common aspect of political discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the individual mentioned, focusing on her professional role and opinions rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging viewers to watch the interview and form their own opinions, though it does have a critical tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites dialogue and criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss foreign policy, a significant public issue, which can contribute to the betterment of society by fostering informed debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by expressing a critical opinion on public policy and encouraging others to engage in the discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.