Jill Stien

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -82

The statement is a critical response to President Biden's claim about his contributions to the Palestinian community. It uses strong language and a quote from a Palestinian writer to emphasize its point.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong and potentially inflammatory language ('jaw-dropping gaslighting' and 'Genocide Joe'), which could be seen as harmful and not conducive to constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech directly, but the use of the term 'Genocide Joe' could be seen as disrespectful and damaging to the dignity of the individual it targets. This partially violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a highly charged and emotional appeal, which can polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a personal attack ('Genocide Joe') and an ad hominem argument rather than addressing the substance of President Biden's claim. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the use of inflammatory language and personal attacks. This partially violates the principle of upholding free speech responsibly and with integrity. [-1]