Ron DeSantis

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 158

The statement and the linked conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue—specifically, the removal of a George Washington statue and its implications for historical memory and political ideology. The tone is critical and defensive of George Washington's legacy, while the intent appears to be to criticize the actions of Democrats and to defend the historical significance of George Washington.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a charged phrase 'Leftism run amok,' which could be seen as inflammatory. This partially violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about 'Democrats,' which could be seen as disrespectful. This partially violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a defensive and accusatory tone. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a generalizing and accusatory tone without engaging in a meaningful discussion. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it generalizes and accuses without substantive evidence. This partially violates the principle of using one's platform responsibly and with integrity. [-1]