Jill Stien

Rank 41 of 47
|
Score -74

The statement is a response to a public figure's announcement about their health and includes a critique of their policies. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a direct link between the public figure's actions and the deaths of civilians in Gaza. The intent appears to be to highlight perceived hypocrisy and to criticize the public figure's policies in a provocative manner.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses a public figure's illness to make a political point, which can be seen as insensitive and harmful. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the public figure, as it uses their illness to launch a critique, which can be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it uses a critical and accusatory tone. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a personal attack by linking the public figure's illness to their policies in a provocative manner. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does exercise free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given the context and tone. [-1]