The statement and linked content involve a critique of media coverage, specifically an exchange between Joy Reid and Jen Psaki, and a comparison made by another user regarding Biden surviving COVID and Trump surviving an assassination attempt. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and media practices, contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a polarized media environment. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the linked content could be interpreted as disrespectful.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more critical and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or avoid personal attacks. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not use the platform responsibly by promoting divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.