Peter Diamandis

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 122

The statement discusses the performance of AI models ChatGPT and Grok in comparison to doctors on a medical licensing exam, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to AI in healthcare. The tone is factual and informative, aiming to highlight the capabilities of AI in a specific professional context.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It presents factual information without derogatory language or implications. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of AI capabilities in the medical field, which can foster empathy and compassion for the potential benefits of AI in healthcare. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the performance metrics of AI models and doctors without targeting individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By highlighting the potential of AI in healthcare, the statement uses its influence to inform the public about advancements that could benefit society. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by providing factual information with integrity. [+2]