Reposted by Matt Taibbi
The statement criticizes a public figure, specifically the President, and engages in a broader discussion about political leadership and public perception. It addresses public concerns about the President's capability and the integrity of those who support him, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that supporters of the President are lying, which could be seen as harmful to their reputation. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes public figures and their actions, which is generally acceptable in public discourse. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more accusatory and divisive. Violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad, accusatory statement without engaging in a reasoned argument. Violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.