The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse by discussing political polling and the potential impact of a political figure on election outcomes. The tone is inquisitive and somewhat skeptical, questioning the reliability of polls and the potential influence of a specific candidate.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It raises a question about the impact of a political figure, which is a common and acceptable part of political discourse. No points added or subtracted.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. No points added or subtracted.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging discussion about the reliability of polls and the potential impact of a candidate. It invites further dialogue and consideration. +1 point. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the reliability of polls and the potential impact of a candidate. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. +1 point. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.