Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement addresses a public issue, specifically foreign policy decisions and their consequences, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived policy failures. The intent appears to be to hold the current administration accountable for its decisions regarding the designation of the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization (FTO).
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but criticizes policy decisions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. No points added or subtracted.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. No points added or subtracted.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism. No points added or subtracted.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of policy decisions without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. +1 point. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to address what they perceive as a significant policy issue, aiming for the betterment of society by advocating for better foreign policy decisions. +1 point. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. +1 point. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.