Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement by Senator Josh Hawley involves a serious allegation regarding the Biden DHS and its handling of security for former President Trump. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue related to government operations and security protocols.
- The statement does not appear to directly cause harm with words and actions, but the potential for harm exists if the allegations are unfounded or misrepresented.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not naming specific individuals, but it could indirectly lead to harassment or cyberbullying of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is accusatory in nature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents an accusation without offering a platform for response or discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- There is no indication in the statement that the speaker acknowledges or corrects mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the speaker's influence to bring attention to a potential issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by addressing security concerns. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by bringing forward concerns from whistleblowers, assuming the allegations are made in good faith. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.